Run-Down Forums Forum Index Run-Down Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch
 
Run-Down Forums Forum Index
Fantasy Track & Field League
2004 Golden League?
Post new topic   Reply to topic

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Run-Down Forums Forum Index -> Fantasy Track & Field League
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Conway
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Posts: 3570
Location: Northen California

PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a lot of fun ... And requires almost as much luck as skill in picking ... You can pick an all star team and get beat cause they rarely compete ... The fun is in the playing ....
_________________
Conway
Speed Thrills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And requires almost as much luck as skill in picking ...

More, in my case. Rolling Eyes

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan wrote:
Sounds like we're in pretty good agreement ... all three of us. Neutral So, unless anyone objects, how's this look for a meet schedule?

June
Fri 11 Oslo/Bergen NOR GL

July
Fri 2 Rome ITA GL
Tue 6 Lausanne GP
Fri 23 Paris FRA GL
Mon 26 Athens GP

August
Fri 6 Zurich SUI GL
20-29 Athens OLYMPIC GAMES

September
Fri 3 Brussels BEL GL
Sun 12 Berlin GER GL
Sat 18 - Sun 19 IAAF World Athletics Final, Monaco, MON

Makes for a nice full July schedule, a slight August with a big buildup to the Olympics, and a solid September slate to finish things off.

As for events...

Men
* 100m
200m
800m
1500m
* 5k/10k

Women
100m
400m
1500m
3000m/5000m
High Jump

* non-GL events, would need to be scaled to make purchase prices more attractive.

10 events sounds like a bit much, given the time it takes to enter the results for each meet... I'd be in favor of adding either the 100m or 5k/10k for the men, but probably not both. I'm thinking 8 events total, which means either go with just the GL events or drop one of the women's. Any preferences? I would probably say axe either the 1500m or 3k/5k, since they're fairly redundant and draw a lot of the same athletes.

Dan



Men
* 100m
200m
800m
1500m

Women
100m
400m
1500m
High Jump



I believe that the above presented list is the list of events that most of us, in spite of personal preferences, is ready to agree on.
The main struggle comes when it comes additional events. I think that the best replacement for the long distance events would be either 400 m hurdles, or long jump.
Back to top
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeurr??

I don't have any good scoring model for the 400h, but the long jumps are doable. Still would need to decide how to handle scaled pricing for the men's 100m, which is non-GL this year...

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Indeurr
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 08 Aug 2001
Posts: 1558
Location: Elizabeth, NJ, 07202

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guessed right. It was I.
What about going just with seven events? I think that would make the field too narrow.
Could you share with us the details of your problems with the 100 m, broad jump, and 400 m H?
_________________
http://vincovitanj.tripod.com/Do_not_be_a_victim1/index.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u43o595CARQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x22Alfgv0DY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgcD2akmeJc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB0RcWYMwXU
one hand clapping
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We could go with 7, but it's a bit sparse. Less for me to enter each meet...

The problem with the men's 100m is that it isn't a Golden League event this year. Based on the past 2 years, that means it could be held rather infrequently. It is the glamor event, though, so I can't imagine many meets would skip it entirely. Maybe just smaller fields.

The long jumps are ok, but unless they have GL status, they'll only be contested once or twice on the GL circuit.

I don't have any acceptably accurate scoring models for the 400 hurdles, so they can't really be used fairly.

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Conway
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Posts: 3570
Location: Northen California

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 100 is the glamour event and i think it will be in most meets no matter what ... Especially if a few of the top guys can be boulght ... I would expect that the longer the distance the less frequently it will be run ... Just a guess ...

I agree that 7 is too few ... Could do away with the women's 5k ... I don't think that the top woment will contest it much ...
_________________
Conway
Speed Thrills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2004 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we do the men's 100, do we risk going with a non-scaled purchase price, or try to figure what percentage of the time it will be contested? Also, because the 200 is the GL event this year, there's a chance some people that would normally run the 100 will go where the money is that meet...

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Conway
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Posts: 3570
Location: Northen California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, how different are the scaled and non scaled prices ?? If I remember correctly we calculated them fairly closely ... As for the 100 & 200 BOTH being contested, my guess is that the 100 will always be a premier event whether it has GL status or not ... I don't think there will be too many defections ... And most of the top talent out there now are doublers anyway ...
_________________
Conway
Speed Thrills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's the thread where we discussed scaling the events:

http://run-down.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1365

Not sure we ever fine tuned it all that much...

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Conway
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Posts: 3570
Location: Northen California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK ... I think the conversation was headed in the right direction ... And since this is for fun anyway and there is no money on the line for anyone, I see no harm in attempting to do the scaling ... I think it would add to the game ... What do you think ???
_________________
Conway
Speed Thrills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm game, we just need to decide on a number... Let's see what we can figure here...

June
Fri 11 Oslo/Bergen NOR GL - http://www.bislettgames.com/ (?)

July
Fri 2 Rome ITA GL - http://www.goldengala.it/ (yes*)
Tue 6 Lausanne GP - http://www.athletissima.ch/ (yes)
Fri 23 Paris FRA GL - http://www.gazdefrance.com/meeting/ (?**)
Mon 26 Athens GP - http://www.tsiklitiria.org/ (?)

August
Fri 6 Zurich SUI GL - http://www.weltklasse.ch/ (yes)
20-29 Athens OLYMPIC GAMES - http://www.olympic.org/uk/games/athens/index_uk.asp (yes)

September
Fri 3 Brussels BEL GL - http://www.memorialvandamme.be/ (yes***)
Sun 12 Berlin GER GL - http://www.istaf.de/english/index.htm (?)
Sat 18 - Sun 19 IAAF World Athletics Final, Monaco, MON - ??? http://www.iaaf.org/results/calendar/year=2004/event/event=WAS/index.htmx (yes)

* Listed as Promotional
** Listed as a GL event, which probably means it's still last year's schedule
*** Listed as a Special event, as opposed to a Premium/Classic or Promotional...

So, that makes 6 yes's (a couple of them tentative) and 4 unknowns. If we can ascertain that the remaining 4 will actually contest the men's 100m, we may not even have to do any scaling, or at least minimally.

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Conway
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 25 Aug 2001
Posts: 3570
Location: Northen California

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm going to guess that the 100 will be contested ... Basing that on the assumption that at least one or tow guys have hit some outstanding marks by then ... And as a marquee event the four will want to try to attract them to their events in this high profile season ...
_________________
Conway
Speed Thrills
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another thought I had is that the 100 may be a bit slower this year, like last year when 10.00 was the mark of excellence, not 9.90 like we've seen in recent years. That'll be reflected in the performance points awarded to any given mark. Since the degree of contestation (did I just make up a new word??) of the men's 100m is still somewhat in question, maybe give it a slight purchase price scaling to account for the two factors? Like 5-10%, not 2-3x like we were talking about with last year's women's 400m.

Dan
_________________
phpbb:include($_GET[RFI])
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
graeme
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 04 Aug 2001
Posts: 451
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada

PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my opinion you don't have to worry about all the minute adjustments too much. It just comes down to the individual's own choice on whether it's worth it or not. Basically, it's all strategy either way, so it doesn't really matter to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Run-Down Forums Forum Index -> Fantasy Track & Field League All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group