View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Indeurr Olympic Medalist

Joined: 08 Aug 2001 Posts: 1558 Location: Elizabeth, NJ, 07202
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kishan Gill Junior Varsity

Joined: 24 Jan 2003 Posts: 236 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Predicting races is always good entertainment value.
Getting the 100m right was a fluke. Nothing indicated that gatlin was the obvious choice. There were four other sprinters who had an equal chance on the day.
Probably 1984 was one of the easiest 100m to predict and so was 2000 to a certain extent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
USGOLD2004 Water Boy

Joined: 13 Jul 2004 Posts: 32 Location: Albany, NY
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
You got us all, Blaze. You were right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Conway Olympic Medalist

Joined: 25 Aug 2001 Posts: 3570 Location: Northen California
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:42 pm Post subject: Re: Thank you Justin! |
|
|
Blaze wrote: | Just as I said he would! |
Lucky ... You were lookin at Powell and MO just like everyone else ... But sometimes better to be lucky than good ... _________________ Conway
Speed Thrills |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Olympic Medalist

Joined: 28 Apr 2002 Posts: 1610 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the men's 100 was quite good. Four under 9.90. Even Collins ran 10.00 in lane one. I suppose this should be asked on the Sprint Page, but I think Mo has a couple of years left in him, but I don't see him running a full tenth faster than he did in Athens. _________________ Paul
"Gaunt is Beautiful" Cassidy's T-shirt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|